In a world becoming ever more interconnected, the scars of war undermine our shared humanity and collective potential. Each conflict silences voices, shatters identities, and prevents countless souls from realizing their dreams. It is crucial that we put an end to all wars and instead promote an environment where democratic principles can flourish. Every individual, regardless of background, should have the unconditional right to express their opinions and their identity. Through this, we honor not only the inherent value of every person but also foster a global community characterized by understanding, cooperation, and peace.

Introduction: This presents a vision for establishing a united and democratic state within the territory currently known as historic Palestine, where principles of justice, religious freedom, equality, and liberty are not merely ideal objectives but also fundamental rights permeating the state’s governance and legal system. We firmly believe that this vision, where all individuals enjoy equal protection, dignity, and opportunities, is entirely achievable through dedicated cooperation, comprehensive engagement, and constructive consensus at both the national and international levels.

The proposed state shall be characterized by:

• Unrestricted justice and equality before the law, where every individual has equal rights and obligations.
• Complete religious freedom and cultural expression, guaranteeing the rights of individuals and groups to freely practice and preserve their religion and culture.
• Equality, free movement, and non-discrimination where access to opportunities and resources is not affected by gender, ethnicity, cultural and religious belief, or socioeconomic status.
• The freedom to express oneself, peacefully assemble, and move within and outside the country’s borders, fundamental to a vibrant democracy and civil society engagement.

This commits to promoting and protecting these principles in creating a new state order that recognizes and respects the norms and obligations of domestic and international legal orders. By working towards these goals, we strive to contribute to lasting just peace and reconciliation in the region and to establish a state where human dignity and fundamental human rights are at the heart of all political and social development.

The also expresses a critical stance towards the Zionist initiative, viewed as a deeply problematic development in humanity’s history. A thorough examination of its outcomes reveals that it has not only intensified conflicts, insecurity, and human suffering locally and globally but also countered the fundamental principles of humanity and justice. Moreover, it points out that Zionism’s underlying ideological foundations, perceived by many to contain racist elements, are incompatible with the values that should characterize a democratic state where equality and recognized human rights are central.

In summary, the addresses critical issues that currently prevent consensus and equality, which instead can create passion for civil society.

1. A democratic state with equal rights in historic Palestine
2. The right of return Compensation for the victims of war
3. Position against Zionism, Anti-Semitism, and Racism
4. The role of UNRWA in establishing a new state order

Ending apartheid and building a democratic state without privileged groups and high walls.

In light of the challenges and ambitions for peace and justice identified within our vision, it is of utmost importance that we now focus our attention on implementing specific measures to realize these goals. The following strategies and actions are recommended to actively work towards lasting peace and genuine justice:

1. Dismantling the separation barriers: The physical barriers surrounding the West Bank and Gaza serve as strong symbols of separation, mistrust, and institutional discrimination. Their dismantling is crucial for fostering a process of reconciliation and reunification and paving the way for a society built on mutual respect and understanding.

2. Establishing an inclusive democratic state: We advocate for the creation of a state characterized by democratic principles and equal rights for all its citizens, where every individual has a voice and no group is favored or discriminated against based on their ethnic, religious, or cultural affiliation.

3. The emergence of an inclusive nation: It is of utmost importance that we include and value the cultural and religious diversity within our societies. This means ensuring equal access to resources and opportunities for all, as well as protecting and respecting the sacred and historical sites significant to all religious and cultural groups within the nation.

4. Education and enlightenment: To promote a deeper understanding and awareness of our collective ambitions and goals, we emphasize the importance of engaging in educational initiatives and enlightenment campaigns. These efforts should aim to convey objective and well-founded knowledge about historical truths, current events, and the actual circumstances surrounding our common endeavors. By providing a robust educational foundation, we can effectively spread awareness and understanding, essential for building an enlightened and engaged society.

5. Shared responsibility: To achieve sustainable justice and peace, it is of utmost importance that we adopt a stance of shared responsibility. This means actively engaging in dialogue and cooperation, as well as deep respect for each other’s rights and differences. By working together inclusively, with openness to different perspectives and experiences, we can lay the foundation for a nation that reflects and honors our shared values. Building a society on these principles requires a commitment from all involved parties to actively contribute to and support processes that promote mutual understanding, coexistence, and respect for human rights.

The right to return and reclaim stolen property

To achieve lasting peace and harmony in the region, the following points must be considered and implemented with authority and justice. By guaranteeing these rights, we can lay a solid foundation for a future characterized by cooperation, understanding, and mutual respect.

The right of return

Within the framework of international law and humanitarian principles, the right of return and the right to compensation are recognized as central elements in establishing justice and promoting reconciliation. This right guarantees that individuals deprived of the right to live in their original homeland, or who have suffered the loss of property, receive the opportunity to return and receive full and fair compensation for the damages they have suffered. Fulfilling these rights is not only a legal obligation under international law but also an ethical necessity for achieving genuine justice and lasting peace.

Every person should have the right to return to their original homeland, regardless of where they are now. Displacement and forced relocation due to conflicts or other factors should not deprive anyone of this fundamental human right. This right to return must be considered and implemented to ensure a fair and lasting solution.

Reclaiming Stolen Property

For those who have lost their property through seizure, occupation, or unauthorized transfer, an independent institution should be established to investigate the aforementioned. Everyone should have the right to reclaim or be compensated for property that has been illegally or unjustly taken from them. The realization of these rights is not only a legal obligation but also a moral duty to achieve true justice and reconciliation.

The implementation of these rights, through a legitimate and conscientious apparatus, is crucial for laying the foundation for a society where reconciliation, cooperation, and lasting peace are possible. International law and its principles provide a framework for addressing and correcting the injustices committed and supporting a process towards justice and reconstruction. It is through this commitment to redress and human rights that a foundation can be laid for a peaceful and inclusive future.

Compensation for the victims of Zionism

Many individuals have suffered extensive losses, including the loss of their homes, property, and in some cases their life’s work, as a direct consequence of political and colonial projects. Therefore, recognition of these damages and full compensation for the innocent victims and their heirs are required, which should not only include financial compensation but also recognition of the suffering and crimes committed. This process should involve a comprehensive and independent investigation of each individual’s losses, both material and emotional, to ensure a comprehensive and fair compensation.

The colonial project associated with Zionism has led to significant consequences, resulting in a considerable number of innocent victims who have lost their homes, property, relatives, and, in some cases, their life’s work. To achieve justice and contribute to the healing of the deep wounds arising from persecution and oppression, the need for a comprehensive compensation program is highlighted. In line with compensations paid to victims of other major historical injustices, corresponding compensation should be offered to those affected by this project. The compensation should not only include financial remuneration but also recognition of the experienced suffering, redress for committed crimes, and serve as a basis for reconciliation.

To realize fair and effective compensation, the program should be based on three pillars:

1. 1. 1. Comprehensive: The program should cover all forms of loss, including physical injuries and psychological trauma, to ensure a comprehensive measure for the damages suffered.
      2. Equitable: Compensation should be based on thorough and independent investigations of individual cases to guarantee a fair assessment of suffering and loss.
      3. Inclusive: The support should not only include individuals directly affected but also subsequent generations impacted by these events’ long-term consequences.

By acknowledging the suffering and providing fair compensation for the experienced losses, decisive steps are taken towards a future characterized by reconciliation, cooperation, and lasting peace. Such a compensation mechanism is not only a measure for justice but also a prerequisite for healing the wounds caused by the colonial project and promoting sustainable and peaceful coexistence.

Palestinians’ unity against anti-Semitism and racism

Palestinians, as a people with deep roots in what is considered one of the world’s oldest civilizations, stand united in their opposition to anti-Semitism and all forms of racism. Despite the complexity of the political and cultural dynamics in the region, many Palestinians adhere to the principle of ethnic and religious diversity as a central part of their cultural heritage. This stance against discrimination is based on the long history of cosmopolitanism and coexistence in the area, where different ethnic and religious groups have long lived side by side. Palestine’s cultural and historical context, with its diverse population including Muslims, Christians, Jews, Druze, Samaritans, and many others, testifies to a long tradition of mutual respect and acceptance. The stance against anti-Semitism and racism is thus not only a reaction against injustice and oppression but also an affirmation of Palestine’s rich and inclusive cultural heritage. By promoting these values, Palestinians strive to build a future where everyone’s rights and dignity are recognized and protected.

Anti-Semitism is a form of prejudice or discrimination against Jews, based on stereotypes and myths, which can manifest in hate, prejudice, or hostility towards Jewish individuals, their religion, or culture. The history of anti-Semitism spans thousands of years and has led to marginalization, persecution, and even genocide, as in the case of the Holocaust during World War II.

Zionism, on the other hand, is a nationalist movement that emerged at the end of the 19th century with the goal of establishing and supporting a Jewish national state in the area historically known as Palestine, in what today are Israel and the Palestinian territories. Zionism has both political and cultural dimensions and is not a homogeneous movement but includes a broad spectrum of views on how this national state should be realized and governed.

A misconception that can arise in discussions about anti-Semitism and Zionism is equating criticism of Zionism or the state policies of Israel with anti-Semitism. While anti-Semitism constitutes hatred or prejudice against Jews as a people or religion, criticism of Zionism or policies practiced by Israel is a political stance that does not necessarily contain prejudices against Jews as an ethnic or religious group. It is important to distinguish between legitimate political opinions and discourses concerning the policies and actions of Israel, and anti-Semitic attitudes and actions directed against Jews as a people or religion.

Calls for the revision of the EU’s adopted definition of anti-Semitism

In 2018, the EU adopted a definition of anti-Semitism that was partially based on the definition developed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), influenced by the Israeli lobby. This definition should be revised to separate criticism of Zionism and Israel from being categorized under the term anti-Semitism.

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) has formulated a working definition of anti-Semitism that has become internationally recognized and used to identify and combat anti-Semitism. The definition reads:

“Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

To distinguish criticism of Zionism from anti-Semitism, it is important to understand that the IHRA’s definition also includes examples of how anti-Semitism can manifest in relation to the state of Israel. A critical point in this context is the note that “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.” This means that legitimate expressions of criticism against Israel’s policies are not automatically classified as anti-Semitic, as long as the criticism stays within the bounds of how other countries are criticized for similar actions or policies.

The problem arises when criticism of Israel exceeds these bounds and employs anti-Semitic stereotypes or conspiracy theories, or when Israel’s existence as a state is questioned in a manner not applied to other countries – this can then be regarded as criticism spilling over into anti-Semitism according to some interpretations of the IHRA’s definition. It is important to remember that the IHRA attempts to balance identifying anti-Semitism related to Israel and allowing legitimate forms of criticism against the state of Israel’s policy without automatically branding such criticism as anti-Semitic.

This balancing act is central when discussing and evaluating statements and actions in relation to Israel and Zionism, and whether they constitute anti-Semitism or legitimate political stances. The IHRA’s definition seeks to provide a framework for this discussion but has also become a subject of debate regarding its application and interpretation, especially in matters related to freedom of speech and criticism of Zionism.

Zionism: A Failed Project

With deep reflection on the lessons of history, we acknowledge that Zionism, which originally emerged as a movement for Jewish self-determination, has in practice evolved into a project that carries deep controversies and has led to significant human suffering. Its implementation, often characterized by colonial methods, has laid the groundwork for prolonged instability and conflict in the region. We see that this process has not only caused suffering for the Palestinian people through the loss of homes and fundamental human rights but has also contributed to profound division and tension on a global level. Therefore, we distance ourselves from aspects of Zionism that can be seen as part of a racist and colonial project. We call for renewed dialogue and the pursuit of a peaceful and just solution, where all peoples in the region can live in peace and with mutual respect. It is time for a new path forward, based on principles of equality, human rights, and international solidarity.

This stance is based on the belief that political ideologies and movements should promote justice, consensus, and well-being for all individuals, regardless of ethnic, religious, or cultural affiliation. In light of this, Zionism is rejected as an ideology that does not harmonize with these fundamental democratic principles and humanity’s quest for a fair and inclusive society. Consequently, a distancing from Zionism is called for in favor of a future where just coexistence and respect for human rights form the cornerstones of societal building.

The significance of distancing from Zionism is based on the understanding that the Zionist ideology and the colonial project, which have been ongoing for 76 years, have failed and thus should be immediately terminated. To achieve lasting peace, it is a fundamental prerequisite for a one-state solution, thereby ending a century of global conflicts.

The suggestion is to return to the historical borders of Palestine and consensus!

The Future Role of UNRWA in Establishing a State

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) is a key player in efforts to support and maintain the Palestinian community, especially among the refugee population in the Middle East.

In a hypothetical future where a one-state solution for the Israel-Palestine conflict becomes a reality, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) would face a significant and historically unique challenge. The organization’s role would need to be redefined and adapted to the new political and social reality. Such a change would mean that UNRWA could play a central role in the transition to and establishment of the new state’s constitution and governance system, where neither the existing legal frameworks of the Palestinian Authority nor Israel are directly applicable without significant modifications. Here are some possible ways in which UNRWA could contribute to this process:

1. Facilitating Dialogue and Consensus Building: UNRWA could act as a neutral facilitator for dialogue between the various community groups and political entities within the new state. Leveraging its long experience working under complex political conditions, UNRWA could support the design of an inclusive constitutional process that reflects the multifaceted needs and rights of all citizens.
2. Supporting the Design of an Inclusive Constitution: With its extensive experience providing education, healthcare, social services, and emergency aid, UNRWA has unique insights into the needs of the most vulnerable population groups. The organization could contribute expertise and advice to ensure that the new constitution includes strong protections for human rights, equality, and social justice, fundamental for building a sustainable and peaceful state.
3. Promoting Economic Integration and Development: Through its work with microfinance and vocational training, UNRWA has experience in promoting economic development and self-reliance. In the context of a one-state solution, UNRWA could expand these programs to support economic integration and development, crucial for building a stable and prosperous economy for the new state.
4. Strengthening Civil Society and Building Institutional Capacity: UNRWA has a longstanding collaboration with local NGOs and civil society organizations. In the new state, UNRWA could play an important role in strengthening civil society organizations and building up institutional capacity. This would include training and support to develop effective public institutions that can deliver services and promote the welfare of citizens.
5. Contributing to Social Cohesion and Reconciliation: One of the greatest challenges with a one-state solution would be promoting social cohesion and a national identity among a population with deeply rooted historical and cultural differences. UNRWA could use its experience working with Palestinian refugees to support programs and initiatives that promote understanding, tolerance, and community across cultural and religious lines.

By transforming its existing capacity and experience to the new context, UNRWA could play a crucial role in the transition to a one-state solution. The organization’s contributions would not only be limited to shaping the new state’s constitution but also laying the groundwork for sustainable peace, social justice, and economic prosperity for all its inhabitants.

UNRWA was established in 1949 with the mission to provide assistance and protection to Palestine refugees after the conflict in 1948, which led to the creation of Israel. Since then, UNRWA’s mandate has been extended and expanded multiple times. The organization’s work spans several key areas that together contribute to maintaining and improving the living conditions of Palestine refugees.

Here are some of the key capacity areas:

1. 1. • Education: UNRWA operates an extensive education program that includes primary schools and vocational schools. The education programs aim to provide quality education to Palestine refugees, which is crucial for the long-term development and stability of the community.
      • Healthcare: The organization provides primary healthcare services, including preventive care, family planning, vaccination programs, and medical treatment. UNRWA’s health program is vital for improving and maintaining the health of Palestine refugees.Social
      • Services: UNRWA offers a wide range of social services, including support for particularly vulnerable refugees, such as the disabled, elderly, and women. These services aim to improve living conditions and promote social integration and protection.
      • Emergency Relief and Social Infrastructure: In areas affected by conflicts and natural disasters, UNRWA provides emergency relief, including food, water, and temporary shelter. The organization also contributes to the development of social infrastructure, such as water and sewage systems, to improve the quality of life.
      • Microfinance: UNRWA’s microfinance program provides small loans to businesses and individuals, promoting economic development and self-reliance among Palestine refugees.
      • Employment and Vocational Training: By offering vocational training and employment opportunities, UNRWA strives to improve employability and economic independence among Palestine refugees.

UNRWA plays a critical role in providing these services to Palestine refugees, who often find themselves in a vulnerable situation due to prolonged conflict, occupation, and limited economic opportunities. Despite economic and political challenges, UNRWA continues to be a vital actor in supporting Palestinian communities through its comprehensive work and programs.

In line with this manifesto, we aim to put forward a as a stance for peace and justice. We share a vision of a united, democratic, and just state where every voice is heard and every individual is respected. Through our collective commitment to promoting justice, peace, reconciliation, and coexistence, we take a significant step forward toward a future where every person’s dignity is inviolable. With the support of this manifesto and our shared willingness to act for change, we are confident in our ability to create a positive and sustainable path forward to a just world from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

Relevent UN Resolutions

1. UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948)
   • Relevance: This resolution addresses the “Right to Return” of Palestinian refugees, stipulating that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property”.
2. UN Security Council Resolution 242 (1967)
   • Relevance: This resolution emphasizes the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war” and calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the 1967 war. It indirectly speaks to the idea of “End Apartheid” and “Tear Down the Walls” by promoting peace and mutual recognition in the region.
3. UN Security Council Resolution 338 (1973)
   • Relevance: Calls for a ceasefire during the Yom Kippur War and the implementation of Resolution 242 to pave the way for peace negotiations.
4. UN Security Council Resolution 446 (1979)
   • Relevance: Addresses the issue of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, considering them a “serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace”. This relates to the point on “Retrieval of Stolen Property”.
5. UN Security Council Resolution 478 (1980)
   • Relevance: Condemns the Israeli law proclaiming a united Jerusalem as its capital and asks member states to withdraw diplomatic missions from the city. This touches upon the significance of Jerusalem and its religious sites.
6. UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 (1974)
   • Relevance: Reaffirms the right of Palestinians to self-determination without external interference, their right to national independence and sovereignty, and the “Right to Return”.
7. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/37/43 (1982)
   • Relevance: This resolution speaks about the rights of the Palestinian people and the need for their self-determination, again touching upon the “Right to Return”.
8. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/52/250 (1998)
   • Relevance: Addresses the rights of Palestinian children, particularly their right to proper education and development, linking to your manifesto’s emphasis on “Education and Enlightenment”.
9. UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016)
   • Relevance: This resolution reiterated its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem. It also emphasized that the establishment of settlements by Israel has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law.

While there are numerous UN resolutions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, these are some of the most pertinent in relation to the key points in your manifesto. Each of these resolutions provides context, international recognition, and in some cases, a legal framework for various elements you’ve addressed.

Som undertecknare av Göteborgsdeklarationen förbinder du dig till ett viktigt initiativ, vilket signalerar ditt helhjärtade stöd för deklarationens vision och innehåll. Genom ditt engagemang blir du en del av en inspirerande rörelse som strävar efter att göra verklig skillnad i världen. Det är viktigt att vi tar en gemensam ställning där din röst väger tyngre med andras.